<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 547 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335902</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The disallowance of the claim of loss under &#039;Business or Profession&#039; was upheld, the disallowance of the deduction under section 24(a) was overturned, and the issue of interest expenses and payment to the Estate Officer was remanded for reconsideration in line with the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 547 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335902</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The disallowance of the claim of loss under &#039;Business or Profession&#039; was upheld, the disallowance of the deduction under section 24(a) was overturned, and the issue of interest expenses and payment to the Estate Officer was remanded for reconsideration in line with the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>