<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 535 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335890</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed both appeals, holding most disputed services as eligible input services except for specific instances where clarity was required regarding their utilization in manufacturing activities. The judgment emphasizes the importance of services directly related to manufacturing and the need for clear evidence to establish eligibility for Cenvat credit under the relevant rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 535 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335890</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed both appeals, holding most disputed services as eligible input services except for specific instances where clarity was required regarding their utilization in manufacturing activities. The judgment emphasizes the importance of services directly related to manufacturing and the need for clear evidence to establish eligibility for Cenvat credit under the relevant rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>