<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 534 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335889</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute regarding availing cenvat credit without payment of duty by converting a factory into a 100% EOU. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal, stating duty payable could be availed as cenvat credit by the EOU. The judgment upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal based on the lack of suppression of facts and sustainability of the duty demand. The time bar for the show cause notice and the application of revenue neutrality principles were crucial in the outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 534 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335889</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute regarding availing cenvat credit without payment of duty by converting a factory into a 100% EOU. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal, stating duty payable could be availed as cenvat credit by the EOU. The judgment upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal based on the lack of suppression of facts and sustainability of the duty demand. The time bar for the show cause notice and the application of revenue neutrality principles were crucial in the outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>