<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 533 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335888</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty issue related to Hairolin-H and accepting the classification claims of the appellant for Brahmi Amla Hair Oil and Ayur natural hair wash as ayurvedic medicinal products. However, the classification of Natural Hair Wash (Amla Shikakai Powder) was upheld based on its distinguishable character as a natural hair wash, in accordance with lower authorities&#039; decisions and legal principles outlined by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:07:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 533 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335888</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty issue related to Hairolin-H and accepting the classification claims of the appellant for Brahmi Amla Hair Oil and Ayur natural hair wash as ayurvedic medicinal products. However, the classification of Natural Hair Wash (Amla Shikakai Powder) was upheld based on its distinguishable character as a natural hair wash, in accordance with lower authorities&#039; decisions and legal principles outlined by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>