<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 528 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to credit the refund amount to the CENVAT account, citing statutory provisions and precedents restricting cash refunds except in specific export scenarios. The judgment reaffirmed the legal framework governing refund claims and the limitations on cash refunds under the Central Excise Act and CENVAT Credit Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:49:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 528 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to credit the refund amount to the CENVAT account, citing statutory provisions and precedents restricting cash refunds except in specific export scenarios. The judgment reaffirmed the legal framework governing refund claims and the limitations on cash refunds under the Central Excise Act and CENVAT Credit Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>