<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 522 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335877</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to process the petitioner&#039;s refund application for excess customs duty paid on imports within two weeks, based on the petitioner&#039;s compliance with Notification No. 12/2012-Ex and alignment with legal principles from previous judgments. The court found the petitioner eligible for the refund, citing their claim in accordance with established legal precedents, and allowed the writ petition without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 522 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335877</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to process the petitioner&#039;s refund application for excess customs duty paid on imports within two weeks, based on the petitioner&#039;s compliance with Notification No. 12/2012-Ex and alignment with legal principles from previous judgments. The court found the petitioner eligible for the refund, citing their claim in accordance with established legal precedents, and allowed the writ petition without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>