<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 514 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the denial of Cenvat Credit under notification No. 12/2012-CE for the import of mobile phones. It held that the appellants were entitled to the exemption by satisfying the conditions, as clarified by subsequent departmental actions. The Tribunal emphasized that denial based on inadmissibility of Cenvat Credit was not valid and that conditions for exemption should be possible to fulfill. The decision was supported by legal principles and precedents, granting the appellants relief and overturning the impugned orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 514 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the denial of Cenvat Credit under notification No. 12/2012-CE for the import of mobile phones. It held that the appellants were entitled to the exemption by satisfying the conditions, as clarified by subsequent departmental actions. The Tribunal emphasized that denial based on inadmissibility of Cenvat Credit was not valid and that conditions for exemption should be possible to fulfill. The decision was supported by legal principles and precedents, granting the appellants relief and overturning the impugned orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>