<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 489 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188685</link>
    <description>Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act is a beneficial redetermination provision, so the three-month limitation runs from any qualifying award made after the provision came into force and not only from the first such award; reading a &quot;first award&quot; restriction into the text would improperly narrow the statutory benefit. The Collector, when redetermining compensation under Section 28-A(2), may also grant interest on the additional amount because that award determines compensation payable to the applicant and attracts Section 34. The provision is intended to remove inequality between similarly placed landowners who did not seek a Section 18 reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 489 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188685</link>
      <description>Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act is a beneficial redetermination provision, so the three-month limitation runs from any qualifying award made after the provision came into force and not only from the first such award; reading a &quot;first award&quot; restriction into the text would improperly narrow the statutory benefit. The Collector, when redetermining compensation under Section 28-A(2), may also grant interest on the additional amount because that award determines compensation payable to the applicant and attracts Section 34. The provision is intended to remove inequality between similarly placed landowners who did not seek a Section 18 reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>