<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1273 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s exemption claim under section 10BA for engaging in substantial manufacturing activities. The department&#039;s appeal against the exemption was dismissed, as the Tribunal found the assessee met the conditions specified under section 10BA. Additionally, the disallowance of belated deposit of employees&#039; contribution was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Vinay Cement Ltd. The Tribunal dismissed both the department&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on all issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1273 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s exemption claim under section 10BA for engaging in substantial manufacturing activities. The department&#039;s appeal against the exemption was dismissed, as the Tribunal found the assessee met the conditions specified under section 10BA. Additionally, the disallowance of belated deposit of employees&#039; contribution was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Vinay Cement Ltd. The Tribunal dismissed both the department&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on all issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>