https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188677 The court allowed the petitions, holding that the impugned notification could not be sustained due to its retrospective nature and contravention of the doctrine of promissory estoppel. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining public faith in governmental commitments and the necessity of good governance. The matter was referred to an appropriate bench for further proceedings regarding the suspension of the order's operation to enable the Union of India to approach the Apex Court. en-us Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188677 The court allowed the petitions, holding that the impugned notification could not be sustained due to its retrospective nature and contravention of the doctrine of promissory estoppel. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining public faith in governmental commitments and the necessity of good governance. The matter was referred to an appropriate bench for further proceedings regarding the suspension of the order's operation to enable the Union of India to approach the Apex Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188677