https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335864 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 does not extend to a private company unless the challenged action involves a public duty or public function. Following the employer's takeover by a private entity, its purely commercial business lacked the required public-law element, making employment-related writ relief unavailable. Subsequent events may inform the moulding of relief but cannot sustain a writ where the respondent is no longer amenable to writ jurisdiction. Order 22 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not permit continuation of such writ proceedings merely because interests were assigned or transferred. Employment claims may instead be pursued through a civil suit, with time spent in writ proceedings potentially protected under the Limitation Act. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:30:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335864 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 does not extend to a private company unless the challenged action involves a public duty or public function. Following the employer's takeover by a private entity, its purely commercial business lacked the required public-law element, making employment-related writ relief unavailable. Subsequent events may inform the moulding of relief but cannot sustain a writ where the respondent is no longer amenable to writ jurisdiction. Order 22 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not permit continuation of such writ proceedings merely because interests were assigned or transferred. Employment claims may instead be pursued through a civil suit, with time spent in writ proceedings potentially protected under the Limitation Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335864