<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 508 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335863</link>
    <description>Prima facie linkage between the predicate offence, alleged proceeds of crime, fund layering and property purchases justified refusal of anticipatory bail to the male petitioners, with the statutory presumption under the money-laundering law reinforcing that result. Investigation-related materials and earlier rejection of the defence in connected proceedings also weighed against them. By contrast, anticipatory bail was granted to the woman petitioner because investigation was complete, the prosecution report had been filed, cognizance had been taken, and she was entitled to the procedural bail consideration available to a woman, subject to conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 508 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335863</link>
      <description>Prima facie linkage between the predicate offence, alleged proceeds of crime, fund layering and property purchases justified refusal of anticipatory bail to the male petitioners, with the statutory presumption under the money-laundering law reinforcing that result. Investigation-related materials and earlier rejection of the defence in connected proceedings also weighed against them. By contrast, anticipatory bail was granted to the woman petitioner because investigation was complete, the prosecution report had been filed, cognizance had been taken, and she was entitled to the procedural bail consideration available to a woman, subject to conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>