https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188672 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the duty payment was made within the prescribed period despite a delay in transferring the amount to the Current Account. The Tribunal determined that Rule 8(3A) did not apply in this case, as the duty was paid on time and interest was paid for the delay. Consequently, the impugned order seeking duty confirmation under Rule 8(3A) was set aside. en-us Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188672 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the duty payment was made within the prescribed period despite a delay in transferring the amount to the Current Account. The Tribunal determined that Rule 8(3A) did not apply in this case, as the duty was paid on time and interest was paid for the delay. Consequently, the impugned order seeking duty confirmation under Rule 8(3A) was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188672