<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 13 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6039</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision on power subsidy classification as a capital receipt. The Court ruled that power subsidies are revenue in nature and subject to taxation, emphasizing that the subsidy in question aimed at reducing electricity costs. This decision favored the Revenue authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 13 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6039</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision on power subsidy classification as a capital receipt. The Court ruled that power subsidies are revenue in nature and subject to taxation, emphasizing that the subsidy in question aimed at reducing electricity costs. This decision favored the Revenue authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>