<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 495 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335850</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the notice for reopening assessment for Assessment Year 2008-09 was issued within the statutory limitation period. The Principal Commissioner correctly determined the issuance date of the notice, clarifying that the focus was on timely issuance rather than service. The court declined to intervene, directing the matter to proceed before the Assessing Officer. The petitioner&#039;s request for an extension of stay was denied, and the petition was disposed of without costs, leaving all contentions open for further proceedings under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2016 23:49:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 495 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335850</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the notice for reopening assessment for Assessment Year 2008-09 was issued within the statutory limitation period. The Principal Commissioner correctly determined the issuance date of the notice, clarifying that the focus was on timely issuance rather than service. The court declined to intervene, directing the matter to proceed before the Assessing Officer. The petitioner&#039;s request for an extension of stay was denied, and the petition was disposed of without costs, leaving all contentions open for further proceedings under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>