<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 494 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335849</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that income from the sale of development rights should be treated as &quot;Capital Gains&quot; rather than &quot;Income from Other Sources.&quot; The assessee was granted indexation benefits up to the transfer date, with lower authorities&#039; additions being deleted. Emphasizing no penalty for delayed tax declaration, the Tribunal applied the correct income classification based on case facts. The judgment was issued on 09.12.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2016 23:49:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 494 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335849</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that income from the sale of development rights should be treated as &quot;Capital Gains&quot; rather than &quot;Income from Other Sources.&quot; The assessee was granted indexation benefits up to the transfer date, with lower authorities&#039; additions being deleted. Emphasizing no penalty for delayed tax declaration, the Tribunal applied the correct income classification based on case facts. The judgment was issued on 09.12.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>