<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 484 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335839</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s right to claim CENVAT credit for input services related to building construction for commercial purposes, following the Oberoi Mall Limited case. It ruled that interest-free security deposits are not taxable based on notional interest, in line with the Murli Realtors Pvt. Ltd. case. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that Service Tax liability does not apply to forfeited amounts as liquidated damages, referencing the United Breweries Ltd. case. The issue of improperly availed CENVAT credit was remanded for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for a thorough review. Overall, the appellant succeeded on key tax treatment issues, with specific points allowed and a remand for further assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 484 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335839</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s right to claim CENVAT credit for input services related to building construction for commercial purposes, following the Oberoi Mall Limited case. It ruled that interest-free security deposits are not taxable based on notional interest, in line with the Murli Realtors Pvt. Ltd. case. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that Service Tax liability does not apply to forfeited amounts as liquidated damages, referencing the United Breweries Ltd. case. The issue of improperly availed CENVAT credit was remanded for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for a thorough review. Overall, the appellant succeeded on key tax treatment issues, with specific points allowed and a remand for further assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>