<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 472 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335827</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing that the denial of refund based on inadmissibility of CENVAT credit was not valid. Citing various judgments, the court directed the respondent to process the refund claims and pay the appropriate amount with interest within three weeks. The decision aligned with previous rulings and clarified the interpretation of relevant legal provisions, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2016 22:02:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 472 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335827</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing that the denial of refund based on inadmissibility of CENVAT credit was not valid. Citing various judgments, the court directed the respondent to process the refund claims and pay the appropriate amount with interest within three weeks. The decision aligned with previous rulings and clarified the interpretation of relevant legal provisions, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>