<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1134 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188663</link>
    <description>Interest on refund of excise duty paid under protest was payable from the date of payment until the date of refund. The Tribunal applied the statutory refund and interest framework in the light of binding precedent and held that, where duty is paid under protest and refund is later granted, interest is not confined to the period after expiry of three months from the refund claim. The assessee was therefore entitled to interest for the full period between payment and refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2016 21:33:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1134 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188663</link>
      <description>Interest on refund of excise duty paid under protest was payable from the date of payment until the date of refund. The Tribunal applied the statutory refund and interest framework in the light of binding precedent and held that, where duty is paid under protest and refund is later granted, interest is not confined to the period after expiry of three months from the refund claim. The assessee was therefore entitled to interest for the full period between payment and refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>