<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1238 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188669</link>
    <description>The Court mandated significant structural changes in BCCI, including the &quot;One State One Vote&quot; principle with exceptions for Maharashtra and Gujarat. It approved amendments to enhance transparency and efficiency, implemented conflict of interest rules, and established an Ethics Officer. The inclusion of a CAG nominee for financial oversight was upheld, along with forming a Players&#039; Association. While considering legalizing betting and criminalizing match-fixing, the Court left the decision to the legislature. It supported reconstituting the IPL Governing Council and imposing limits on office bearers&#039; terms. The Committee was tasked with overseeing the reforms within four to six months to restore public trust and improve cricket management.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2016 21:33:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1238 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188669</link>
      <description>The Court mandated significant structural changes in BCCI, including the &quot;One State One Vote&quot; principle with exceptions for Maharashtra and Gujarat. It approved amendments to enhance transparency and efficiency, implemented conflict of interest rules, and established an Ethics Officer. The inclusion of a CAG nominee for financial oversight was upheld, along with forming a Players&#039; Association. While considering legalizing betting and criminalizing match-fixing, the Court left the decision to the legislature. It supported reconstituting the IPL Governing Council and imposing limits on office bearers&#039; terms. The Committee was tasked with overseeing the reforms within four to six months to restore public trust and improve cricket management.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>