<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6033</link>
    <description>Whether additional tax under s. 143(1A) can be levied where the assessee returned a net loss but the loss was reduced on prima facie adjustments under s. 143(1)(a). The SC held that the expression in s. 143(1A) covers cases where the returned loss is reduced due to adjustments made under s. 143(1)(a), treating such reduction as falling within the statutory ambit for levy of additional tax. Consequently, the challenge to the levy failed and the additional tax was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 15:56:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6033</link>
      <description>Whether additional tax under s. 143(1A) can be levied where the assessee returned a net loss but the loss was reduced on prima facie adjustments under s. 143(1)(a). The SC held that the expression in s. 143(1A) covers cases where the returned loss is reduced due to adjustments made under s. 143(1)(a), treating such reduction as falling within the statutory ambit for levy of additional tax. Consequently, the challenge to the levy failed and the additional tax was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>