https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335822 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a show cause notice initiating suo motu revision was not maintainable at the notice stage because an effective statutory revisional remedy existed and the revisional authority was not shown to be wholly without jurisdiction. The Court applied the settled rule that writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked before the authority has considered the party's objections, absent a clear case of total lack of jurisdiction or fundamental breach of natural justice. The petitioners were left free to raise all factual and legal objections before the revisional authority, which was directed to decide the revision expeditiously after hearing them. en-us Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:40:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335822 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a show cause notice initiating suo motu revision was not maintainable at the notice stage because an effective statutory revisional remedy existed and the revisional authority was not shown to be wholly without jurisdiction. The Court applied the settled rule that writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked before the authority has considered the party's objections, absent a clear case of total lack of jurisdiction or fundamental breach of natural justice. The petitioners were left free to raise all factual and legal objections before the revisional authority, which was directed to decide the revision expeditiously after hearing them. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335822