<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 464 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335819</link>
    <description>A Commissioner&#039;s clarification does not override the taxing statute, and an Assessing Officer acting quasi-judicially must apply the statute rather than an inconsistent executive view. On classification, welded wire mesh and wire links were treated as commercially distinct goods, having different manufacture, characteristics, uses and commercial identity, so the dispute turned on commodity classification rather than any binding effect of the clarification. The Court found no basis to interfere at the threshold, particularly where an effective alternate remedy was available, and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2016 08:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 464 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335819</link>
      <description>A Commissioner&#039;s clarification does not override the taxing statute, and an Assessing Officer acting quasi-judicially must apply the statute rather than an inconsistent executive view. On classification, welded wire mesh and wire links were treated as commercially distinct goods, having different manufacture, characteristics, uses and commercial identity, so the dispute turned on commodity classification rather than any binding effect of the clarification. The Court found no basis to interfere at the threshold, particularly where an effective alternate remedy was available, and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>