https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188647 The Chief Justice controls the roster and allocation of judicial business, and a puisne Judge cannot in collateral proceedings call for the record of a disposed matter, question a lawful transfer to a Division Bench, or issue contempt notice against the Chief Justice for exercising that administrative power. The document also states that disparaging remarks against the Chief Justice, the Division Bench, and former Chief Justices over alleged illegal daily allowance drawal and misappropriation were made without hearing the persons concerned, lacked factual foundation, and were legally unsustainable. It concludes that such observations, allegations, and the contempt notice were quashed and expunged. en-us Tue, 25 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Dec 2016 12:36:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188647 The Chief Justice controls the roster and allocation of judicial business, and a puisne Judge cannot in collateral proceedings call for the record of a disposed matter, question a lawful transfer to a Division Bench, or issue contempt notice against the Chief Justice for exercising that administrative power. The document also states that disparaging remarks against the Chief Justice, the Division Bench, and former Chief Justices over alleged illegal daily allowance drawal and misappropriation were made without hearing the persons concerned, lacked factual foundation, and were legally unsustainable. It concludes that such observations, allegations, and the contempt notice were quashed and expunged. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188647