<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6030</link>
    <description>SC upheld imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) against the assessee. The Court held the Explanation is integral to section 271 and operates once a notice under that section is issued; no separate expression invoking the Explanation in the notice is required. Where returned income is less than 80% of assessed income (subject to the Explanation), the assessee is deemed to have concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars unless he proves the shortfall did not arise from fraud or neglect. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6030</link>
      <description>SC upheld imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) against the assessee. The Court held the Explanation is integral to section 271 and operates once a notice under that section is issued; no separate expression invoking the Explanation in the notice is required. Where returned income is less than 80% of assessed income (subject to the Explanation), the assessee is deemed to have concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars unless he proves the shortfall did not arise from fraud or neglect. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>