https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6028 In a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, the High Court had to answer the questions already referred on the facts found by the Tribunal and could not decline jurisdiction by remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The proper course was for the High Court to hear and dispose of the references afresh on the material already available. The Supreme Court held that the High Court's approach was incorrect, set aside the order under appeal, and restored the references to the High Court for fresh disposal. en-us Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Aug 2018 17:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6028 In a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, the High Court had to answer the questions already referred on the facts found by the Tribunal and could not decline jurisdiction by remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The proper course was for the High Court to hear and dispose of the references afresh on the material already available. The Supreme Court held that the High Court's approach was incorrect, set aside the order under appeal, and restored the references to the High Court for fresh disposal. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6028