<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 448 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335803</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by modifying the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation of profit, applying a Net Profit rate of 10% subject to interest and depreciation. The Tribunal set aside the separate addition under Section 68, emphasizing the importance of reasonable estimation based on past history and the impracticality of making additional additions once the books of account are rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 13:22:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 448 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335803</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by modifying the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation of profit, applying a Net Profit rate of 10% subject to interest and depreciation. The Tribunal set aside the separate addition under Section 68, emphasizing the importance of reasonable estimation based on past history and the impracticality of making additional additions once the books of account are rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>