<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 435 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335790</link>
    <description>Excess unaccounted goods found during stock verification may be confiscated where the assessee offers no satisfactory explanation for the non-accountal, and later reliance on mixed stacking of different varieties does not excuse the accounting lapse. Redemption fine is to be assessed by reference to the value of the goods at the time of confiscation, not their later condition when sought to be released. Penalties on both the company and its managing director may also be sustained where the record shows contravention of the applicable excise law and rules, and the quantum is treated as commensurate with the breach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 435 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335790</link>
      <description>Excess unaccounted goods found during stock verification may be confiscated where the assessee offers no satisfactory explanation for the non-accountal, and later reliance on mixed stacking of different varieties does not excuse the accounting lapse. Redemption fine is to be assessed by reference to the value of the goods at the time of confiscation, not their later condition when sought to be released. Penalties on both the company and its managing director may also be sustained where the record shows contravention of the applicable excise law and rules, and the quantum is treated as commensurate with the breach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>