<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 430 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 25,000 imposed on the licensed Customs House Agent under Section 158(2)(ii) of the Customs Act. The Commissioner&#039;s order was found unsustainable as it lacked specific rules or regulations necessary for imposing penalties. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief to the appellant by overturning the penalty decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 430 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 25,000 imposed on the licensed Customs House Agent under Section 158(2)(ii) of the Customs Act. The Commissioner&#039;s order was found unsustainable as it lacked specific rules or regulations necessary for imposing penalties. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief to the appellant by overturning the penalty decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>