<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 429 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order revoking the CHA license of the appellant. The Commissioner&#039;s actions were deemed non-compliant with the mandatory time limits outlined in the CBLR, 2013 regulations. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to prescribed timelines in proceedings related to the suspension and revocation of custom broker licenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 429 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order revoking the CHA license of the appellant. The Commissioner&#039;s actions were deemed non-compliant with the mandatory time limits outlined in the CBLR, 2013 regulations. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to prescribed timelines in proceedings related to the suspension and revocation of custom broker licenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>