https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335781 Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be invoked until that remedy is exhausted. The Karnataka High Court noted that the assessee's first appellate order was adverse and that the second appeal under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, had not been filed before the Tribunal. It therefore relegated the petitioner to the alternate statutory remedy, while directing that any appeal filed within fifteen days be considered on merits without objection on limitation. Further steps were left open if the Department produced proof of stay of the earlier judgment. en-us Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:32:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335781 Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be invoked until that remedy is exhausted. The Karnataka High Court noted that the assessee's first appellate order was adverse and that the second appeal under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, had not been filed before the Tribunal. It therefore relegated the petitioner to the alternate statutory remedy, while directing that any appeal filed within fifteen days be considered on merits without objection on limitation. Further steps were left open if the Department produced proof of stay of the earlier judgment. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335781