https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335759 The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling in favor of classifying certain expenditures as revenue in nature and treating registration charges for the lease deed as revenue expenditure. However, the claim for additional depreciation for windmill installation was rejected as the canteen operations did not qualify as manufacturing. en-us Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Dec 2016 21:10:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335759 The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling in favor of classifying certain expenditures as revenue in nature and treating registration charges for the lease deed as revenue expenditure. However, the claim for additional depreciation for windmill installation was rejected as the canteen operations did not qualify as manufacturing. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335759