<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 395 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335750</link>
    <description>The service tax exemption threshold under Notification No. 6/2005-ST, as amended, depends on the aggregate value of taxable services received during the financial year, read with the explanation tied to the first consecutive payments under section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. Receipts in the accounts were examined and amounts attributable to services rendered to SEZ units were excluded. On that basis, the aggregate did not exceed the threshold, so the resulting service tax demand, which rested entirely on an assumed breach of the limit, could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 395 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335750</link>
      <description>The service tax exemption threshold under Notification No. 6/2005-ST, as amended, depends on the aggregate value of taxable services received during the financial year, read with the explanation tied to the first consecutive payments under section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. Receipts in the accounts were examined and amounts attributable to services rendered to SEZ units were excluded. On that basis, the aggregate did not exceed the threshold, so the resulting service tax demand, which rested entirely on an assumed breach of the limit, could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>