<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 389 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335744</link>
    <description>The tribunal found the demand unsustainable and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting consequential reliefs. It concluded that the department failed to conclusively establish that the goods mentioned in the disputed invoice were not received by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:30:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 389 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335744</link>
      <description>The tribunal found the demand unsustainable and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting consequential reliefs. It concluded that the department failed to conclusively establish that the goods mentioned in the disputed invoice were not received by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>