https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335740 The appeal was allowed by way of remand as the Member (Judicial) found it crucial to examine documents proving the sale on Free on Rail (FOR) basis before denying CENVAT credit on outward transportation services. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a fresh decision based on evidence on record and any additional evidence. This case emphasizes the importance of thoroughly evaluating relevant documents to determine the admissibility of credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, ensuring a just outcome in tax matters. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:30:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335740 The appeal was allowed by way of remand as the Member (Judicial) found it crucial to examine documents proving the sale on Free on Rail (FOR) basis before denying CENVAT credit on outward transportation services. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a fresh decision based on evidence on record and any additional evidence. This case emphasizes the importance of thoroughly evaluating relevant documents to determine the admissibility of credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, ensuring a just outcome in tax matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335740