<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 384 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority to verify if the appellant correctly reversed the cenvat credit for input services used in manufacturing exempted goods. If the reversal was accurate, no further action was needed; otherwise, the appellant was directed to rectify the credit with interest. The appeal was disposed of with this decision, highlighting the significance of precise cenvat credit reversals in similar scenarios.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:30:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 384 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority to verify if the appellant correctly reversed the cenvat credit for input services used in manufacturing exempted goods. If the reversal was accurate, no further action was needed; otherwise, the appellant was directed to rectify the credit with interest. The appeal was disposed of with this decision, highlighting the significance of precise cenvat credit reversals in similar scenarios.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>