https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188607 Concurrent factual findings on disputed stock taking, alleged suppressed purchases and sales, and related additions left no substantial question of law for interference in the tax appeal. The assessment and first appellate orders had already examined the stock verification, and the Tribunal noted that the verification was carried out meticulously twice in the presence of the assessee's technical representatives. As the record supported the first appellate authority's conclusions and no infirmity was shown in the concurrent findings, the High Court declined to entertain the appeal on merits and dismissed it. en-us Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Dec 2016 16:46:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188607 Concurrent factual findings on disputed stock taking, alleged suppressed purchases and sales, and related additions left no substantial question of law for interference in the tax appeal. The assessment and first appellate orders had already examined the stock verification, and the Tribunal noted that the verification was carried out meticulously twice in the presence of the assessee's technical representatives. As the record supported the first appellate authority's conclusions and no infirmity was shown in the concurrent findings, the High Court declined to entertain the appeal on merits and dismissed it. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188607