https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335731 The Tribunal found that the appellant had acted in good faith, taken reasonable steps to verify the importer's identity, and fulfilled their obligations under the relevant regulations. Consequently, the charges against the appellant were not substantiated, leading to the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit being set aside, with the appeal being allowed. en-us Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Dec 2016 15:50:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335731 The Tribunal found that the appellant had acted in good faith, taken reasonable steps to verify the importer's identity, and fulfilled their obligations under the relevant regulations. Consequently, the charges against the appellant were not substantiated, leading to the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit being set aside, with the appeal being allowed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335731