<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335727</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition challenging the assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act, directing the respondent to consider the duplicate part of the C-Form submitted by the petitioner. The Court emphasized that the duplicate part is crucial for verifying the genuineness of the claim for concessional tax rates. Relying on a previous judgment, the Court held that filing the duplicate part instead of the original part constitutes compliance with the law. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration by the respondent, who was instructed to assess the duplicate part of the C-Form.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 15:05:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335727</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition challenging the assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act, directing the respondent to consider the duplicate part of the C-Form submitted by the petitioner. The Court emphasized that the duplicate part is crucial for verifying the genuineness of the claim for concessional tax rates. Relying on a previous judgment, the Court held that filing the duplicate part instead of the original part constitutes compliance with the law. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration by the respondent, who was instructed to assess the duplicate part of the C-Form.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>