https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335720 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 will ordinarily not be exercised against SARFAESI measures taken under Section 13(4) where an efficacious statutory appeal lies under Section 17. The Gujarat HC held that the challenged recovery action could be adjudicated before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, and no recognised exception to the alternative-remedy rule was shown because the impugned action was not demonstrated to be without jurisdiction. The petition was therefore not maintainable at that stage, and the aggrieved party was relegated to the statutory appellate forum. en-us Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Dec 2016 06:53:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335720 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 will ordinarily not be exercised against SARFAESI measures taken under Section 13(4) where an efficacious statutory appeal lies under Section 17. The Gujarat HC held that the challenged recovery action could be adjudicated before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, and no recognised exception to the alternative-remedy rule was shown because the impugned action was not demonstrated to be without jurisdiction. The petition was therefore not maintainable at that stage, and the aggrieved party was relegated to the statutory appellate forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335720