<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 353 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335708</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals without costs, as the Revenue did not challenge the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the inapplicability of Section 50C of the Income Tax Act to the transfer of leasehold rights in land and buildings. The Court found no substantial question of law, citing the Revenue&#039;s acceptance of a previous similar decision. The judgment was based on legal interpretations and principles, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 353 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335708</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals without costs, as the Revenue did not challenge the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the inapplicability of Section 50C of the Income Tax Act to the transfer of leasehold rights in land and buildings. The Court found no substantial question of law, citing the Revenue&#039;s acceptance of a previous similar decision. The judgment was based on legal interpretations and principles, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>