<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 689 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188600</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay set aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision denying the Appellants a deduction under Section 80-I of the Income Tax Act for manufacturing gutka containing tobacco. The Court ordered the appeals to be heard along with related cases for different years by the Tribunal in Pune for uniformity. The Appellants agreed not to claim any refund until all connected appeals were decided. The judgment aimed to ensure consistency and comprehensive review of issues related to Section 80-I.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 18:03:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 689 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188600</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay set aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision denying the Appellants a deduction under Section 80-I of the Income Tax Act for manufacturing gutka containing tobacco. The Court ordered the appeals to be heard along with related cases for different years by the Tribunal in Pune for uniformity. The Appellants agreed not to claim any refund until all connected appeals were decided. The judgment aimed to ensure consistency and comprehensive review of issues related to Section 80-I.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>