https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335696 The Tribunal ruled in favor of VHPL regarding the exemption of service tax under Notification No.13/2003, determining that the exemption did not apply to services provided to customers of Venco/VRB. The extended period for tax demand was not invoked for services before 2004. The invocation of Section 80 for penalty imposition was deemed incorrect, and only penalties under Section 78 were upheld. Liability for service tax on services to Venco/VRB customers was confirmed, with penalties imposed. The appeals were disposed of on 21/10/2016. en-us Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Apr 2017 10:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335696 The Tribunal ruled in favor of VHPL regarding the exemption of service tax under Notification No.13/2003, determining that the exemption did not apply to services provided to customers of Venco/VRB. The extended period for tax demand was not invoked for services before 2004. The invocation of Section 80 for penalty imposition was deemed incorrect, and only penalties under Section 78 were upheld. Liability for service tax on services to Venco/VRB customers was confirmed, with penalties imposed. The appeals were disposed of on 21/10/2016. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335696