<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 336 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188598</link>
    <description>Goods imported under an additional import licence were treated as not liable to confiscation or redemption fine where the importers acted bona fide on earlier court directions permitting import of items not specifically banned and on the shared understanding reflected in licensing and customs communications. The accepted bona fide conduct was the ative factor, and on that footing confiscation and redemption fine were found unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:57:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 336 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188598</link>
      <description>Goods imported under an additional import licence were treated as not liable to confiscation or redemption fine where the importers acted bona fide on earlier court directions permitting import of items not specifically banned and on the shared understanding reflected in licensing and customs communications. The accepted bona fide conduct was the ative factor, and on that footing confiscation and redemption fine were found unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>