https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335691 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the appeal against duty demand for clandestinely removing manufactured goods. The appellant successfully challenged the Revenue's claim of excess production and clearance without duty payment by demonstrating that fly ash, an input, cannot be entirely utilized in cement manufacturing. The tribunal found the Revenue's presumption of no production loss to be erroneous and noted the lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegation. As a result, the impugned order was set aside due to lack of merit, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any. en-us Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:21:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335691 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the appeal against duty demand for clandestinely removing manufactured goods. The appellant successfully challenged the Revenue's claim of excess production and clearance without duty payment by demonstrating that fly ash, an input, cannot be entirely utilized in cement manufacturing. The tribunal found the Revenue's presumption of no production loss to be erroneous and noted the lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegation. As a result, the impugned order was set aside due to lack of merit, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335691