<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 791 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188590</link>
    <description>The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the deductibility of expenditure on LMW spinning frame and high speed draw frames under the Income Tax Act, following the judgment in a similar case. The Court affirmed the entitlement to deduction of the employer&#039;s contribution to provident fund and family provident fund, allowing the claim even if the payment was made after the accounting year but within the grace period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:53:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 791 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188590</link>
      <description>The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the deductibility of expenditure on LMW spinning frame and high speed draw frames under the Income Tax Act, following the judgment in a similar case. The Court affirmed the entitlement to deduction of the employer&#039;s contribution to provident fund and family provident fund, allowing the claim even if the payment was made after the accounting year but within the grace period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>