<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 319 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335674</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the revocation order of the customs broker licence was set aside by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI on 04/11/2016. The decision was based on procedural irregularities, lack of evidence, and the discrediting of evidence in the appellate proceedings, leading to the reversal of the revocation order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 319 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335674</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the revocation order of the customs broker licence was set aside by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI on 04/11/2016. The decision was based on procedural irregularities, lack of evidence, and the discrediting of evidence in the appellate proceedings, leading to the reversal of the revocation order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>