https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335665 Where paddy had already suffered tax at the general rate, the governing notification scheme was read as preventing any further tax on inter-State sale of rice manufactured from that paddy. The Rajasthan HC relied on its earlier binding decisions treating the notifications as a coordinated scheme and rejecting the view that the State could issue a redundant notification. On that footing, the assessee was entitled to the benefit recognised in the prior rulings, and the pending challenge before the Supreme Court did not justify postponing disposal. The petition was dismissed because the claim remained covered by existing precedent. en-us Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335665 Where paddy had already suffered tax at the general rate, the governing notification scheme was read as preventing any further tax on inter-State sale of rice manufactured from that paddy. The Rajasthan HC relied on its earlier binding decisions treating the notifications as a coordinated scheme and rejecting the view that the State could issue a redundant notification. On that footing, the assessee was entitled to the benefit recognised in the prior rulings, and the pending challenge before the Supreme Court did not justify postponing disposal. The petition was dismissed because the claim remained covered by existing precedent. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335665