https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335662 A writ petition challenging notices and measures under the SARFAESI Act was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal was available before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under section 17. The High Court applied the settled rule that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised where an effective alternative remedy exists, particularly in recovery proceedings under special statutes. It held that the petitioners could raise all factual and legal objections before the Tribunal, and therefore it did not examine the merits of the challenge. en-us Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:55:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335662 A writ petition challenging notices and measures under the SARFAESI Act was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal was available before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under section 17. The High Court applied the settled rule that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised where an effective alternative remedy exists, particularly in recovery proceedings under special statutes. It held that the petitioners could raise all factual and legal objections before the Tribunal, and therefore it did not examine the merits of the challenge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335662