https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335661 Confiscation under Section 67C(2) of the Abkari Act will be disturbed only if the owner proves that the conveyance was used without the knowledge or connivance of the owner, agent and person in charge, and that all of them took reasonable and necessary precautions against misuse. The record showed use of the vehicle by the petitioner's brother, who was involved in the offence, and there was no proof that the person in charge had taken the required precautions. The confiscation was therefore upheld and the challenge failed. en-us Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335661 Confiscation under Section 67C(2) of the Abkari Act will be disturbed only if the owner proves that the conveyance was used without the knowledge or connivance of the owner, agent and person in charge, and that all of them took reasonable and necessary precautions against misuse. The record showed use of the vehicle by the petitioner's brother, who was involved in the offence, and there was no proof that the person in charge had taken the required precautions. The confiscation was therefore upheld and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335661